Skip to content
Founder Workflows
BrowseSaved
Browse by stage

Ship two paid Mac utilities in 23 days with Claude writing the Swift code, then test which free launch channels sell

A solo developer built a notch app and a developer disk cleaner, with Claude writing most of the second app's Swift, and logged where 69 orders and about $530 gross came from. Threads beat X, paid launch sites sold nothing.

ClaimedDistributionDigital productSmall SaaSAI-assisted manual work

Evidence: The author reports this. We have not checked it beyond reading the source.

The business problem

A solo maker wants to get paid software out quickly and learn, with real sales data, which cheap launch and distribution channels actually bring buyers rather than just visitors.

What was tried

1. Build the first app (Halo, a notch utility) and sell it through Lemon Squeezy, with Umami analytics and ref-tagged links on every post to trace sources, plus a Telegram bot that reports each sale. 2. Launch on Product Hunt at $4.99 with a 3-day trial (finished #31 for the day). Fix bugs the same day from paying users' support emails. 3. For the second app (Shedi, a developer disk cleaner), write the spec and safety rules for what may be deleted yourself and have Claude write the Swift code. Reuse the site template and licensing code from the first app. Spec to ship took about two days. 4. Raise prices once sales prove out: the author dropped Halo's trial for a 14-day refund policy and doubled the price to $9.99. 5. Post on Threads and X, list on free directories, post an Ask HN, and add an interactive in-browser demo to the product site. Compare channels in analytics. 6. Check AI assistants too: the author found ChatGPT recommending Shedi first for a Mac cleaner query, apparently via a free directory listing.

What was reported (positive)

Self-reported after 23 days: 69 orders and $530.85 gross (about $470 after the payment provider's fee), one refund. Halo made 66 sales ($500.97), Shedi 3 sales ($29.88). Threads drove about seven times more visitors than X. Free directory listings sent almost no direct visitors, but one was cited by ChatGPT. Paid launch sites that cold-emailed the author produced no buyers. The interactive demo helped close at least one sale.

Limitations

Revenue figures are self-reported with no inspectable proof. AI use is limited to code generation for the second app, and the article does not say which Claude product or model was used or how much of the code it wrote. Most of the revenue came from the first app, whose build process is not described as AI-assisted. About half of the traffic is untraceable direct traffic, so channel attribution is partial. The author sells both apps and the post promotes them. Very short time span and small sample.

What you need

Ability to read and review Swift code, a Mac developer setup, a payment provider such as Lemon Squeezy, and an analytics tool that records referrers.

Sources

Source published: October 18, 2026. Last reviewed here: October 22, 2026. Spot a mistake? Tell us.

Tools in this workflow

Get new workflows like this by email

A short selection of the most useful new workflows, including the ones that did not work. Free, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Your email address

Related workflows

Ship two paid Mac utilities in 23 days with Claude writing the Swift code, then test which free launch channels sell | Founder Workflows